EXERT FROM APPENDIX 1 from Don Featherstone's Battles With Model Soldiers
(The book that got me started.)

"Nothing in these pages is a dictate, no word says you must or you shall do it this way. On the contrary, the book sets out from the very beginning to stimulate the reader to think for himself, and to use what he has read merely as a foundation for efforts and ideas which reflect his own temperament and character. Only in this way will he obtain maximum satisfaction from the hobby of battling with model soldiers."

-Don Featherstone 1918 - 2013

Saturday, July 27, 2013

Laying the groundwork

The first step in cobbling together a new set of rules is to figure out just what you want from them and how you intend to use them. Easy to do in the broadest sense but somewhat trickier when you try to force yourself to be explicit.

In this case, my intent is to play tabletop miniature wargames which evoke the battles and skirmishers from epic or heroic literature whether fictional, historical or fantasy. Examples of the sort of literature I have in mind include Hal Foster's Prince Valiant comic strips and Robert E Howard's Conan tales but also Rosemary Sutcliffe's novels. Note that the intent is to evoke these not replicate them. I will also include enough of a nod to history as to satisfy myself.

As in the use of negative space in art, sometimes it is useful to define what the rules are not.

The majority of games will be solo but I do not wish to design a player vs the game (or GM) style of wargame but desire a conventional player vs player approach for the rules. Should a one sided approach be of use for a particular game then suitable techniques can be incorporated into the scenario design.

I also do not wish a role playing game or a game focussing on individuals other than the main heroes. The rules will need to handle the occasional one on one duel style of combat but most games will involve clashes between groups of men whether these form a small raiding party portrayed at 1:1 or small armies portrayed at 1:10. The difference will be purely theoretical with Heroes having their capabilities and separate identity and everyone else operating as units of men.

Lastly I wish the game to be as gimmick free as possible. There should be an absolute minimum of overt rules to resolve actions but the story lines and player decisions should emerge from the player's imaginations and the scenario design not the game mechanics . The foe to be outwitted should be their opponent or the situation, not the rules. The combat and morale dice should be sufficient friction to render outcomes unpredictable.

The Prince, wielding the Singing Sword for the first time, holds a bridge against a "unit" of Vikings, for a while at least.
Illustration borrowed from the Wikipedia article on Prince Valiant.

On the whole my expectation is that missile combat will be normally be an annoyance or spur that causes some casualties. Individual combat between heroes may be quick or prolonged but will usually end with one or the other being killed or incapacitated. Principal characters will of course normally be wounded and taken prisoner or be rescued or left behind rather than killed.  Melees between units should often be prolonged with one side being suddenly and irrevocably broken, either by being surprised, perhaps by an attack in the rear, or by being worn down.


Mechanic wise, the rules in general will be similar to Rattle of Dice, with initiative, move or shoot, fight melee etc with simple rolls and simple tests but with extra rules for the characters.

The first draft should be ready in a day or three.








10 comments:

  1. Hope that you had a great birthday, Ross.


    -- Jeff

    ReplyDelete
  2. Looking forward to this, Ross. Rattle is now my ruleset of choice and has actually enabled me to play some games.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting ideas of what you don't want the rules to be as well interesting potentialities ahead.I can't wait to read them.
    best wishes
    Alan
    p.s I have taken the plunge into metal 42mm figs...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw that. Great scale, perfect compromise for me.

      Delete
  4. Ross I forgot to say my 40mm vikings await the rules with great anticipation...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Ross,

    Skirmish rules can be very easy or very difficult depending upon how much you want to put into the rules set. In terms of combat, I was looking at the picture of Prince Valiant battling the bad guys and several things came to mind:
    1. Valiant gets multiple hits when fighting more than one enemy.
    2. Valiant can take two or three wounds while his enemy would take only one unless an enemy leader.
    3. If using magic, there are all sorts of possibilities. Val can disappear, Valiant can become impervious to harm (a bit extreme!) forces of nature can be summoned like flocks of crows or earthquakes bringing down landslides or causing the path on the edge of th cliff to crumble - hopefully with your enemy on it.
    4. Valiant can "call out" the enemy leader to single combat and if he wins the enemy leader's minions flee in terror with a colossal loss of morale.
    Anyway, it will be interesting to see the first draft of these rules.
    Jerry

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been through a few ideas and drafts already and closing in on the first official one. Heroes will indeed be able to make multiple attacks and take multiple wounds and I do have challenges built in, hadn't gone as far as mass panic though.

      Magic is more problematic since the older tales don't use it like modern games, movies or books but I have a framework I think will work with lots of hazard for the (evil usually) magician who tries anything too powerful.

      Delete